tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.comments2016-09-16T09:45:40.575-07:00The English QabalahSamuel.K.Vincenthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12525108707649150021noreply@blogger.comBlogger120125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-16578855051494713192016-09-16T09:45:40.575-07:002016-09-16T09:45:40.575-07:00Can you post the Lexicon and Cube of sapace?
Can you post the Lexicon and Cube of sapace?<br />FR. Enolahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00872017405137414047noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-47889933595419779062016-09-06T14:07:35.483-07:002016-09-06T14:07:35.483-07:00Greetings Fr. Enola,
Yes, I will try and answer as...Greetings Fr. Enola,<br />Yes, I will try and answer as best I can. In the meantime, we're currently developing a website replete with lexicon and a gematria calculator to assist with independent research. The website (still under construction) can be found here: http://www.englishqabala.com <br />Regards,<br /> Samuel.K.Vincenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12525108707649150021noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-6894639813896972842016-08-28T05:13:06.428-07:002016-08-28T05:13:06.428-07:00Sam Vincent, Are you still available for Questions...Sam Vincent, Are you still available for Questions?FR. Enolahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00872017405137414047noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-51855716597127746162014-06-13T21:46:50.865-07:002014-06-13T21:46:50.865-07:00Hello Mr. Vincent,
I've been trying to contac...Hello Mr. Vincent,<br /><br />I've been trying to contact the editor via email about the recent publishing & so far no luck.gflohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03925790290749295056noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-88963152586364596542013-06-19T09:15:08.080-07:002013-06-19T09:15:08.080-07:00Anon,
C=3, K=11
duck=D4+U21+C3+K11=39
Don't...Anon,<br /><br />C=3, K=11<br /><br />duck=D4+U21+C3+K11=39<br /><br />Don't make something simple(6,74) difficult because Samuel is misleading you and everyone with his opinion that no other English(7,74) gematria(8,74) supports! Look around the Internet.Brad Watson, Miamihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05234079588322665605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-38353961102693539982013-06-19T09:10:40.183-07:002013-06-19T09:10:40.183-07:00WRONG!
W=23 w=23. Whether a letter is a Capital o...WRONG!<br /><br />W=23 w=23. Whether a letter is a Capital or not does NOT affect its gematria(74) - no matter what language it is! Brad Watson, Miamihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05234079588322665605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-22066202394815086162013-06-19T09:00:26.649-07:002013-06-19T09:00:26.649-07:00Sam(S19+A1+M13=33),
Your bizarre code is doing mo...Sam(S19+A1+M13=33),<br /><br />Your bizarre code is doing more harm than good(7__4) to the 'English(7,74) Gematria(8,74) Movement'.<br /><br />GOD(7_4) wants you to STOP!Brad Watson, Miamihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05234079588322665605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-5207269536225958512013-06-19T08:54:05.726-07:002013-06-19T08:54:05.726-07:00gflo,
You are being misled...
Edward=E5+D4+W23+A...gflo,<br /><br />You are being misled...<br /><br />Edward=E5+D4+W23+A1+R18+D4=55, etc.Brad Watson, Miamihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05234079588322665605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-52739088800220544752013-06-19T08:48:35.100-07:002013-06-19T08:48:35.100-07:00Erik(4 letters, E5+R18+I9+K11=43),
A=1,B=2...Z=26...Erik(4 letters, E5+R18+I9+K11=43),<br /><br />A=1,B=2...Z=26. This is the simplest alphanumeric code/cipher there is! A 6-year-old 1st Grader can understand and work with this, i.e. cat=C3+A1+T20=24.Brad Watson, Miamihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05234079588322665605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-85951243748066991182013-06-19T08:45:07.833-07:002013-06-19T08:45:07.833-07:00Yuri(4 letters, Y25+U21+R18+I9=73),
Why was this ...Yuri(4 letters, Y25+U21+R18+I9=73),<br /><br />Why was this moved?Brad Watson, Miamihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05234079588322665605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-65778279125610402262013-06-16T12:21:39.358-07:002013-06-16T12:21:39.358-07:00I am very interested as to the process used to ass...I am very interested as to the process used to assign the values....? how was what each letter in English valued determined?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12256400609820972290noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-30560146980636976502012-11-20T07:00:20.802-08:002012-11-20T07:00:20.802-08:00I see you're still deceiving people with misin...I see you're still deceiving people with misinformation. Too bad.<br /><br />I just wrote the following on the Facebook page of Catholic Fundamentalism...<br /><br />It's now been proven that this universe behaves as a quantum computer where everything is connected and particles not only collide, they compute. Therefore, we have an additional definition of GOD: 'the universal quantum computer' (UQC). <br /><br />Where there is a computer, there are programs. And where there are programs, there are programmers, program #1 and programmer #1. The original programmer was God incarnate: the eternal soul of Jesus the Christ. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was GOD" (note the difference between 'God' and 'GOD'). Simple(6,74) English(7,74) Gematria(8,74) now reveals these secrets...<br /><br />GOD=7_4=G7+O+D4<br />Jesus=74=J10+E5+S19+U21+S19<br />program 1=74=P16+R18+O+G7+R18+A1+M13+1<br />connect=74=C3+O15+N14+N14+E5+C3+T20<br />between=74=B2+E5+T20+W23+E5+E5+N14Brad Watson, Miamihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05234079588322665605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-61254955803708363582012-08-26T06:37:58.138-07:002012-08-26T06:37:58.138-07:00Simple(6,74) English(7,74) Gematria(8,74)
YHWH=Y2...Simple(6,74) English(7,74) Gematria(8,74)<br /><br />YHWH=Y25+H8+W23+H8=64 <br />G.A.O.T.U.=G7+A1+O15+T20+U21=64 <br />Holy One=64<br />mercy=M13+E5+R18+C3+Y25=64<br />Avraham=64 (Lincoln=64, he was 6'4", reelected in '64, and is buried in 64 sq. ft. of concrete) <br />Moriah=64 <br />Zion=64<br />Israel=64<br />Cohens=64<br />(a Mason's) apron=64<br />chosen=64<br />mother=64<br />Peter=64 (The Great Fire of Roma occured in 64 AD and St. Peter was crucified upside down in 64-66 AD)<br />dust=64<br /><br />Brad Watson, Miamihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05234079588322665605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-33651693365062092522012-08-07T11:36:03.528-07:002012-08-07T11:36:03.528-07:00Hello Mr. Vincent
I have quite a few questions co...Hello Mr. Vincent<br /><br />I have quite a few questions concerning some technical workings of this system. From observation I have taken a hint from your use of the values, but need further clarity.<br /><br />It seems that whenever there are double letters or "twins" each are counted the same value of a particular phase as in your use of either the SS or SS final. For example OO is either counted 400 or 160 (ŎŎ) & not alternatively as 280 (OŎ). Is this correct as a rule in general or does it matter? If so what are the implications?<br /><br />It seems that in some words or word-constructs that L can be upright in one position & averse in another all in the same word as in "bilingual" (or English Qabalah). Technically the first L is balanced while the second is not. Should the natural position dictate its count as the default value? Or should they both be counted as either balanced or averse? If so what are the implications?<br /><br />It seems that some words & word-constructs have more terminal values than one. Is it proper to alternate between these terminal values regardless of position as operational under certain conditions? For example could the word "spirit" be counted as 133 (T final) or 160 (S final)? & as a rule in general is it proper to count both or all terminal letters as final in the same word or phrase? (If so "spirit" would then alternatively be counted as 151) Is this plausible? If so what are the implications?<br /><br />Thank you,gflohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03925790290749295056noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-5341539684273293422012-07-12T10:02:42.628-07:002012-07-12T10:02:42.628-07:00Hello Bobby,
I've checked & it seems that...Hello Bobby,<br /><br />I've checked & it seems that the E8 theory has been conclusively disproven.<br /><br />gflogflohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03925790290749295056noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-53057817316767716732012-07-11T20:11:25.831-07:002012-07-11T20:11:25.831-07:00Hello Bobby,
Although physical existence has the ...Hello Bobby,<br /><br />Although physical existence has the Aethyrs as its substance & composition, this physical existence is not an Aethyr in & of itself so it would be extremely difficult to see the connection with a theory of everything that involves physical existence as the whole. Parallel comparisons can always be made between one thing & another, but that reason alone isn't enough to justify making them. There has to be some other inherently objective or observable reason that would make such an assumption plausible & worthy of any attention. However I understand sometimes that is all we have to begin with before we learn of its practicality, that sometimes imagination must proceed reasoning. <br /><br />In relation to other geometric forms I can say that yes I've looked at some of them & yes they can be applied to various other geometries in groups that extend infinetely throughout a single form (& though this can be done somewhat imperfectly, for the symbols exhaust at 27, I'm not exactly sure of its use or meaning). The Tree of Life (& of course the Book of Formation) is very satisfactorily compatible with the Cube itself as well as the I Ching & its variations.The E8 Theory is yet to be completed or verified, as far as I know, & I would appreciate any recent developments, as of this year, on the subject. The Cube & its correspondences, as of now, are also incomplete & unverified from a mutual standpoint. Much has changed from what has been posted in the past comments you've been reading. The more that is known & uncovered about the Aethyrs & their structure, the more this could point us in the right direction, but not until then... <br /><br />Thank you,<br /><br />gflogflohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03925790290749295056noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-66314475656567688272012-06-20T08:34:00.944-07:002012-06-20T08:34:00.944-07:00Hey very interesting ideas and post. I am not to n...Hey very interesting ideas and post. I am not to number savey, but i wanted to ask about the hypercube idea. I was wondering if you guys have seen some of the other ideas with higher dimensional cubes,shapes and objects. Quite a few of them come out of the I-ching and its variations, also to the E8 in physics, the tree of life, sepher yetzirah,the enochian squares of 64, renaissance painting, various alchemical text and on and on. I was just wondering what you guys think about this idea as a whole do you think in a way this is the philosopher's stone in some respects; many people trying to represent the transcendental in a more true correspondent form as a higher dimensional form in order to try and evoke the transcendental into time. Thanks for your time and workBobbyhttp://perennialthought.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-18913038724194782812012-06-03T15:58:26.044-07:002012-06-03T15:58:26.044-07:00The Black Left Hand Path counterparts to Nuit, Had...The Black Left Hand Path counterparts to Nuit, Hadit,and Ra Hoor Khuit, are Besz, Grub, and Apophrasz Ra. And, Katahari is the Fall of the Hero.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-37882240852777228542012-05-02T13:35:26.235-07:002012-05-02T13:35:26.235-07:00Samuel,
See: http://7seals.yuku.com/topic/152
Yo...Samuel,<br /><br />See: http://7seals.yuku.com/topic/152<br /><br />Your sentence is not "etched in granite74". You can repent, correct your errors, notify me, and I will commute your sentence. But knowing your ego, I don't predict it.Brad Watson, Miamihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05234079588322665605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-19088188246801377772012-05-02T13:10:21.651-07:002012-05-02T13:10:21.651-07:00"To err is human, to repent divine, to persis..."To err is human, to repent divine, to persist devilish" - Benjamin Franklin<br /><br />Samuel K. Vincent,<br /><br />I see that you are continuing to dismiss the correct 'Simple(6,74) English(7,74) Gematria(8,74)' and continue to promote your incorrect gematria. Therefore...<br /><br />By the power(77) invested in me by GOD(7_4) as His Christ(77), I hereby declare that today, 5/2/12, is your Judgment Day - you FAIL F.<br /><br />Your sentence: 'bad luck' for the rest of this life, then 74 years reincarnated as beef cows for this one offense (you have many more).<br /><br />- Brad Watson(77), Miami<br />(a copy of this judgment can be found at http://7seals.yuku.com )Brad Watson, Miamihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05234079588322665605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-72020587490703833552012-05-02T13:05:56.166-07:002012-05-02T13:05:56.166-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Brad Watson, Miamihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05234079588322665605noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-22643010469304677432011-11-24T17:33:51.990-08:002011-11-24T17:33:51.990-08:00I wonder if i might bother you for your analysis o...I wonder if i might bother you for your analysis of the y in words such as Royce? I have been treating the y here as a vowel. Is this always correct in such cases?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-58873977956836462842011-11-24T13:42:22.088-08:002011-11-24T13:42:22.088-08:00Dear Mr. Vincent
Many thanks for your detailed re...Dear Mr. Vincent<br /><br />Many thanks for your detailed response to the question of ck. I am happy that you take such a careful and considered approach to each case. My own question was about Rock, and i am very pleased to have your analysis. Quite fascinating.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-84338011684640202352011-11-22T12:49:53.215-08:002011-11-22T12:49:53.215-08:00GFLO,
We are preparing the second edition of The E...GFLO,<br />We are preparing the second edition of The English Qabalah with many additions, including your own works on the Cube of Space and the Trigrams--the value of the contribution of which, to the body of work in the EQ, I find to be inestimable, a critical advancement, and necessary to any further understanding of the system. As such I've requested that it be included in the book, and I would like to see you credited for that work. For these reasons I would need the name you choose to go by as Author of these Works. Shall GFLO (as in Frater or Soror GFLO) suffice, or would you like to see some other name provided?<br /><br />Thank you GFLO.Samuel.K.Vincenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12525108707649150021noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1972522623787643615.post-15903158915991487762011-11-22T12:46:00.243-08:002011-11-22T12:46:00.243-08:00Anonymous:
That's an excellent question; and I...Anonymous:<br />That's an excellent question; and I want to thank you for it. The 'ck' combination is perplexing. The c is, I agree, phonetically superfluous. I believe it to be fading, that with internet and phone texting as it is, words like neck, back, sock, will soon all be spelt nek, bak, sok... so that the hard or soft C is somehow anachronistic; and mysteriously, even counter-intuitively in the larger scheme of things, appears to be disappearing.** <br /><br />But to answer your question: I don't believe you can take the c as silent, i.e. despite its possible disappearance, if the glyph is present in the word or formula, then you must count it, until it ceases to be there. Now, do we count it hard (30) or soft (3)? Suppose we don't know. We can take some sample data and look at the alternatives. Let's choose something simple and clear to avoid any possible confusion. <br /><br />We can take the words 'sick', 'attack' -- two simple enough ideas (but any others will do).<br />So we have (58 + C) for ‘sick’ and (234 + C) for ‘Attack’. Now, if c is soft then ‘sick’ is 61 (which we already know cannot be… but let’s assume we don’t); and ‘attack’ is 237. If c is hard, then ‘sick’ becomes 88 and ‘attack’, 264.<br /><br />So we have two possibilities: <br />(a) ‘sick’ is 61 and ‘attack’ is 237; or <br />(b) ‘sick’ is 88 and ‘attack’ is 264. <br /><br />Let’s start with the idea/word ‘sick’ first: <br />• Under the identity ’61’ we have: “Place” (as in “let it reside in one place”) ; Made He (as in Made He the Worlds); Kheph-RA; Help (ideas consistent with AIN)<br />• Under identity ‘88’ we have: “He is Mad”, KALI, Maim, Vice, Saw (versus See), Bind, etc…<br /><br />Certainly the idea of ‘sick’ pertains to identity 88. 61 appears to be ‘Holy’ if I can resort to a colloquialism. <br /><br />Now, let us look at ‘attack’: <br />• For 237, we have: Drug, Gladness, Khu, Rosa…<br />• While for 264 we have, A Lion, Curse, Pestilence, Python, Severities, Typhon, I am the Heart (with T final).<br /><br />Again, attack appears to be counted with C hard as the ideas of 264 are concordant with the idea of an attack or attacking, whereas 237(Drug, gladness, ROSA) obviously are not. You can continue this analysis until you are satisfied. E.g. Rock can be 122 or 149. 122 contains ‘feather’ and ‘fly’ so once again, it is looking as though c is hard.<br /><br />Finally, we can look for concordance on the material plane: if c were ‘soft’ then words like back, sack would sound phonetically like bask, sask, but with c ‘hard’ they sound like bakk, sakk, which conforms to the reality. (I’m aware that you know this, but I wish only to stress the point of syncreticism and concordance among the planes).<br /><br />You should also be aware that I believe every C can be hardened or softened depending on its environment. The C, the W, the O, the L are all ‘active’ keys (possibly the Y) and they appear to be ‘switched on’ under certain conditions (aethyrs, etc). <br /><br />Thank you. <br /><br /><br />**(In this way, it may appear 'reasonable' to switch the usual syncretic attributions for C and K. For if C is the Cup and Aquarius and so Queens, while K the Virgin is Scorpio and so the Hermit: how is that we find the Queens waning and not the Hermit? Also the old line in Liber Al: "Tzaddi is not the Emperor - that is, while Z must still be Aries in Nature, the glyph of its manifestation on the ROTA is not "The Emperor" or ATU IV. If one takes this as a fact, integrity and symmetries inherent in the system imply further readjustments of the ROTA key to accommodate this change. For instance, very basically: if Tzaddi is not the Emperor, then some other glyph must be, and so this requires switching out a second glyph. If it switches out with the first we are done; otherwise the system cascades. Perhaps at the end of the Aeon, all we will have of the C is its part in the Ch glyph: i.e. She is enthroned alway.)Samuel.K.Vincenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12525108707649150021noreply@blogger.com